Can an airline be held liable for deaths caused by a terrorist attack on the terminal?

In the context of an airline's liability for deaths caused by a terrorist attack on the terminal, the correct answer is that an airline could be found liable if it failed to meet certain safety standards or protocols that are typically expected in the industry. This focuses on the airline's obligation to ensure the safety and security of its passengers.

Airlines are generally responsible for security measures within their control, including the selection and management of security personnel and procedures. If it can be demonstrated that an airline neglected to implement standard safety protocols that would have reasonably prevented such an attack, the airline could indeed be held liable. Courts often assess whether the airline's actions fell below the accepted standard of care that would be expected in the aviation industry.

In this scenario, factors such as adherence to regulations, past incidents, risk assessments, and the adequacy of the security measures in place would play a significant role in determining liability. Thus, the airline's legal responsibility could be affirmed if these security failures contributed to the outcomes of the attack.

Other options, while addressing aspects of the situation, do not encapsulate the nuanced approach of liability that hinges on the violation of standard safety protocols. For instance, merely stating that an airline must ensure customer safety in the terminal or declaring that they