If you provide inconsistent statements during the informal conference and an appeal, what can the FAA attorney do?

The chosen answer is correct because inconsistent statements can significantly weaken a person's credibility in legal proceedings. In the context of an informal conference and an appeal, if an FAA attorney notices inconsistencies in your statements, they have the option to highlight these discrepancies to challenge your reliability as a witness. This undermining of credibility can affect the outcome of the case, as it may lead decision-makers to doubt the accuracy of your claims or defenses.

Maintaining a consistent narrative is crucial in legal contexts, especially when presenting information to regulatory bodies like the FAA. If inconsistencies arise, it provides the attorney a basis to argue that any testimony or claims made are suspect, potentially swaying the outcome of administrative or legal proceedings.

Other options are less appropriate in this situation. Ignoring the inconsistency would not be a practical approach for an attorney whose role is to advocate for the best interpretation of the evidence. Filing additional charges would typically require a different basis, such as evidence of wrongdoing, rather than simply inconsistent statements. Requesting a new informal conference may not be warranted unless there is a valid reason for doing so, such as new evidence coming to light or procedural errors occurring. Thus, the most logical and impactful action for the FAA attorney when faced with inconsistent statements is to