What action should a maintenance director take upon discovering an aircraft has not met an FAA Airworthiness Directive?

The correct choice involves the maintenance director taking immediate action to rectify the situation and ensure compliance with FAA regulations. When an aircraft does not meet an FAA Airworthiness Directive (AD), it indicates that there is a safety issue that must be addressed promptly. This directive is issued to prevent potential safety hazards, and failing to comply puts the aircraft, its passengers, and others at risk.

By performing the necessary maintenance, the director not only corrects the identified issue but also helps to maintain the aircraft’s airworthiness status. Additionally, reporting the violation is crucial because it aligns with regulatory transparency and accountability. Such reporting may involve informing the FAA of the situation and what corrective actions have been taken, which is important for maintaining compliance records and ensuring that all aviation safety standards are upheld.

In contrast, documenting the issue for future reference does not address the immediate need for compliance, while delaying action until the next maintenance cycle could exacerbate safety risks. Preparing a report solely for insurance purposes does not fulfill the obligation to rectify the non-compliance highlighted by the AD. Therefore, the most responsible and legally compliant action is to conduct the necessary maintenance and report the violation, ensuring the aircraft is safe and adheres to all FAA requirements.