What happens if a city airport authority fails to comply with grant terms when making changes to the airport?

If a city airport authority fails to comply with the terms of a grant when making changes to the airport, the consequences primarily involve the potential loss of future federal funding. This is because grants provided by the federal government for airport development or improvement come with specific obligations and conditions that must be adhered to. The intent of these conditions is to ensure public accountability and the effective use of federal funds.

When the authority does not follow these requirements, it can lead to scrutiny from federal oversight bodies. In many cases, the failure to comply with grant terms can jeopardize the airport's ability to receive funding for future projects. Essentially, adherence to grant conditions serves to protect both the interests of the federal government and the commitment to serve the public through the operational integrity of the airport.

The other options do not accurately reflect the consequences of non-compliance. For instance, the suggestion that no consequences occur contradicts the foundational purpose of federal grants, which is to ensure compliance. Local laws overriding grant terms is not a valid assertion, since federal law typically takes precedence in matters involving federal funds. Finally, the idea that only non-compliance notifications are issued does not capture the serious financial ramifications that can follow if the terms are not met.