What is a common remedy sought by plaintiffs in negligence cases?

In negligence cases, plaintiffs typically seek monetary damages as a common remedy because these damages are intended to compensate for injuries or losses suffered as a result of the defendant's negligent actions. The primary goal of this compensation is to make the injured party whole again, or to put them in a position as close as possible to where they would have been had the negligence not occurred. This can include various forms of damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage.

In contrast, other remedies listed are less common in negligence cases. While injunctions (a court order to do or stop doing something) can be sought in some situations, they are typically relevant in cases involving ongoing harm rather than seeking compensation for past injuries. A formal apology might be desired by the plaintiff for personal reasons, but it does not equate to a legal remedy that addresses the financial impact of negligence. Lastly, a reduction in punitive damages is not typically sought by plaintiffs; rather, punitive damages are aimed at punishing the defendant and deterring similar behavior, and reductions of such damages are more relevant to defendants who may be contesting excessive awards.

Thus, monetary damages for injuries or loss is the most appropriate and common outcome pursued by plaintiffs in negligence cases