Which two main concerns have been the focus of most litigation regarding airports and airspace?

The focus of most litigation regarding airports and airspace has prominently centered on aircraft noise and ensuring that airport approaches remain clear of obstacles. Aircraft noise has long been a contentious issue for populations living near airports, as it can significantly impact their quality of life. Legal challenges often arise from residents or community groups seeking to limit noise pollution generated by aircraft, which can lead to demands for modifications in flight paths, operating hours, or the adoption of quieter aircraft technologies.

On the other hand, maintaining clear approaches to airports is crucial for flight safety. Obstructions in these approaches can pose risks during take-offs and landings, leading to potential accidents. Regulatory bodies have various guidelines and standards to ensure that approaches are adequately maintained, and litigation often seeks to enforce these standards when there are concerns regarding the presence of structures or natural obstacles that could endanger flight operations.

In this context, the importance of addressing both aircraft noise and clear approaches illustrates how critical these issues are in aviation law, as they directly affect the operation of airports and the safety of air travel. This dual focus aligns with the legal principles governing airport operations and community relations, demonstrating why these areas are frequently the subject of litigation.